|
2004
Marie and Bruce
Juliane Moore and Matthew Broderick get nasty in Marie and Bruce
By Brooke Hauser, Premiere
It’s lunch hour for the cast of Marie and Bruce,
and everything seems a bit . . . off. Sure, there are the usual wilting
buffet options, but it’s hard to tell what city we’re in, let alone
what decade it is, given the motley crew occupying the room: an
Amazonian drag queen, a sixtysomething diva sporting a headdress and
hot-pink sari, and two Julianne Moores.
Not to be confused with her stand-in, the real Julianne Moore
sits patiently before a vanity mirror as a stylist combs out her
signature amber waves. In this adaptation of Wallace Shawn’s 1979 play,
she and Matthew Broderick star as warring mates who make an Edward
Albee couple seem happily married by comparison. Directed by Tom Cairns
(making his big-screen debut), the under $3 million film chronicles 24
hours in the life of the titular pair as they curse, berate, and
humiliate each other in increasingly fresh and profound ways.
“[Studios] would read it and say, ‘This is awful! These people are
terrible!’ ” Moore says. “And we would go, ‘It’s a comedy.’ And they’d
go, ‘Are you kidding?’ ” Fortunately, actor-director Campbell Scott
came to the rescue in 2003 when he took the screenplay to Holedigger
Films (Roger Dodger), which immediately sparked to the film’s originality, and lack of contextual clues.
For instance, today’s scene, shot in a Queens loft, unfolds at a
cocktail party at the end of a blisteringly hot day in a city that
resembles New York, but isn’t. Likewise, the party guests resemble
various hip Manhattan characters, but aren’t. Even the dialogue is
distorted. “[Bruce] talks very fancy,” Broderick says of his character,
who in this scene turns from milquetoast to man of the hour. “A lot of
‘wells’ and ‘reallys’ and ‘actuallys’ and ‘errs.’ Today is horrifying.
I have five pages of me blathering away, which I’m terrified I won’t
remember.”
“It’s an unusual piece, almost like an experiment,” Cairns says of
the production’s strange and dreamy milieu. “It’s not set in outer
space, yet it’s not social realism. We deliberately tried not to be
specific.” He sighs, adding, “It’s such a hard thing to talk about
without sounding totally pretentious.”
|